PAGE TOP


  • Posted on
  • 2017,8
  • 5

Lecture Based learning vs Discussion Based or Active learning

In today’s class, we talked a lot about different styles of learning in the classroom.

 

 

 

learningpyramid

 

 

Ever since I was in grade school in Hawaii, the majority of subjects were taught under discussion based and active learning styles.  In other words, we didn’t just sit and listen to a teacher talk for 50 minutes.  We also had group discussions, presentations, and actual learning activities and experiments.  I honestly thought this was a very good way to learn.  It kept the classes interesting.

 

ElemG

 

 

 

 

The only class I struggled in was math.  Why?  I think it is because math is pretty much a straight lecture class, and there is really only one correct answer.  Also if you make one tiny mistake in any part of the equation, your whole answer will be wrong.  But I digress.

 

635907321972663929-2093495740_tumblr_mc2fhkfwgw1qa9c27o1_1280

 

 

According to my students today, both people have had decades of experience in teaching their subjects to high school students.  And they were talking about how recently Japan has been trying to get away from their traditional lecture style teaching.  In other words, where the students just sit and listen to the teacher talk for an hour.

 

lecture

 

In Japan it is standard.  In the USA it would be considered very boring.

 

82888d88074bdc4818abbef1d6b3b5a7

 

 

 

How about you?  What are your thoughts?

 

 
Which would you prefer in the classroom?

 

 

 

 

A straight lecture?

P2190595

 

Or some interaction, opinion giving discussions and group work in a class?

 

04.05.2009 Deutschland, Berlin, Berlin Metropolitan School, Linienstrasse 122-124,Mathemathikunterricht in der 5. Klasse.-DIGITAL PHOTO.50MB. Copyright:Jens Rötzsch

 

 

And why???